EatBetterEatBetter
Foods ▾
Ready & Packaged FoodsVegetables & LegumesDesserts & ConfectioneryMeat & ProteinGrains & BakeryBeveragesMilk & DairyNatural & Other Foods

Ready & Packaged Foods

All →
Fast Food & RestaurantBurgers · Pizza · Doner & Wrap · Fried Sides · Restaurant Menu Items

Explore foods by category, subcategory or brand

CompareBrands
Tools ▾

Calorie Calculator

Work out your daily calorie needs

BMI Calculator

Body mass index from your height and weight

Food GuideCompareBlog
TR
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Tuna purslane salad vs Fish

A side-by-side comparison on calories, macros, glycemic index and more.

The short answer

Per 100 g: Tuna purslane salad has fewer calories; Fish has more protein; Tuna purslane salad has more fiber; Fish has a lower glycemic index.

🥗

Tuna purslane salad

100 g

🐟

Fish

100 g

90kcal

Calories

110kcal
13.2g

Protein

22✓g
2.4g

Carbs

0g
1.1✓g

Fiber

0g
3.2g

Fat

2.5g
15

Glycemic Index

0✓
0.4

Glycemic Load

0✓
315mg

Potassium

350✓mg

Change food 1

Change food 2

Try another comparison

EatBetter

Scan calories with your camera

Instant AI nutrition analysis

App StoreGoogle Play
Tuna purslane salad vs Fish — Calories & Nutrition Compared | EatBetter