Foods ▾
Ready & Packaged FoodsVegetables & LegumesDesserts & ConfectioneryMeat & ProteinGrains & BakeryBeveragesMilk & DairyNatural & Other Foods
Ready & Packaged Foods
All →Vegetables & Legumes
All →Desserts & Confectionery
All →Meat & Protein
All →Grains & Bakery
All →Beverages
All →Milk & Dairy
All →Tools ▾
Food GuideCompareBlogTR
Sweetened Hazelnut Paste (Fiskobirlik) vs Almond
A side-by-side comparison on calories, macros, glycemic index and more.
The short answer
Per 100 g: Sweetened Hazelnut Paste (Fiskobirlik) has fewer calories; Almond has more protein; Almond has more fiber; Almond has a lower glycemic index.
🥄
Sweetened Hazelnut Paste (Fiskobirlik)
100 g
🥜
Almond
100 g
570kcal
Calories
579kcal
10.2g
Protein
21.2✓g
32.5g
Carbs
21.6g
7.2g
Fiber
12.5✓g
44g
Fat
49.9g
50
Glycemic Index
15✓
16
Glycemic Load
1✓
680mg
Potassium
733✓mg
Change food 1
Change food 2
Try another comparison
Sweetened Hazelnut Paste (Fiskobirlik) vs Egg
Sweetened Hazelnut Paste (Fiskobirlik) vs Butter
Sweetened Hazelnut Paste (Fiskobirlik) vs Ground Beef
Sweetened Hazelnut Paste (Fiskobirlik) vs Tomato
Sweetened Hazelnut Paste (Fiskobirlik) vs Hawthorn Vinegar
Sweetened Hazelnut Paste (Fiskobirlik) vs Mixed Green Salad
Scan calories with your camera
Instant AI nutrition analysis
