EatBetterEatBetter
Foods ▾
Ready & Packaged FoodsVegetables & LegumesDesserts & ConfectioneryMeat & ProteinGrains & BakeryBeveragesMilk & DairyNatural & Other Foods

Ready & Packaged Foods

All →
Fast Food & RestaurantBurgers · Pizza · Doner & Wrap · Fried Sides · Restaurant Menu Items

Explore foods by category, subcategory or brand

CompareBrands
Tools ▾

Calorie Calculator

Work out your daily calorie needs

BMI Calculator

Body mass index from your height and weight

Food GuideCompareBlog
TR
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Pan-cooked tuna vs Salmon Fillet

A side-by-side comparison on calories, macros, glycemic index and more.

The short answer

Per 100 g: Pan-cooked tuna has fewer calories; Pan-cooked tuna has more protein.

🐟

Pan-cooked tuna

100 g

🐟

Salmon Fillet

100 g

184kcal

Calories

206kcal
29.9✓g

Protein

22g
0g

Carbs

0g
0g

Fiber

0g
6.3g

Fat

13g
0

Glycemic Index

0
0

Glycemic Load

0
444✓mg

Potassium

384mg

Change food 1

Change food 2

Try another comparison

EatBetter

Scan calories with your camera

Instant AI nutrition analysis

App StoreGoogle Play
Pan-cooked tuna vs Salmon Fillet — Calories & Nutrition Compared | EatBetter