EatBetterEatBetter
Foods ▾
Ready & Packaged FoodsVegetables & LegumesDesserts & ConfectioneryMeat & ProteinGrains & BakeryBeveragesMilk & DairyNatural & Other Foods

Ready & Packaged Foods

All →
Fast Food & RestaurantBurgers · Pizza · Doner & Wrap · Fried Sides · Restaurant Menu Items

Explore foods by category, subcategory or brand

CompareBrands
Tools ▾

Calorie Calculator

Work out your daily calorie needs

BMI Calculator

Body mass index from your height and weight

Food GuideCompareBlog
TR
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Harra tuna vs Salmon Fillet

A side-by-side comparison on calories, macros, glycemic index and more.

The short answer

Per 100 g: Harra tuna has fewer calories; Harra tuna has more protein; Salmon Fillet has a lower glycemic index.

🐟

Harra tuna

100 g

🐟

Salmon Fillet

100 g

190kcal

Calories

206kcal
25✓g

Protein

22g
0.8g

Carbs

0g
0g

Fiber

0g
9.3g

Fat

13g
15

Glycemic Index

0✓
1

Glycemic Load

0✓
340mg

Potassium

384✓mg

Change food 1

Change food 2

Try another comparison

EatBetter

Scan calories with your camera

Instant AI nutrition analysis

App StoreGoogle Play
Harra tuna vs Salmon Fillet — Calories & Nutrition Compared | EatBetter