EatBetterEatBetter
Foods ▾
Ready & Packaged FoodsVegetables & LegumesDesserts & ConfectioneryMeat & ProteinGrains & BakeryBeveragesMilk & DairyNatural & Other Foods

Ready & Packaged Foods

All →
Fast Food & RestaurantBurgers · Pizza · Doner & Wrap · Fried Sides · Restaurant Menu Items

Explore foods by category, subcategory or brand

CompareBrands
Tools ▾

Calorie Calculator

Work out your daily calorie needs

BMI Calculator

Body mass index from your height and weight

Food GuideCompareBlog
TR
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Fiskobirlik Sweet Hazelnut Paste vs Chicken Wrap

A side-by-side comparison on calories, macros, glycemic index and more.

The short answer

Per 100 g: Chicken Wrap has fewer calories; Chicken Wrap has more protein; Fiskobirlik Sweet Hazelnut Paste has more fiber; Fiskobirlik Sweet Hazelnut Paste has a lower glycemic index.

🥄

Fiskobirlik Sweet Hazelnut Paste

100 g

🌯

Chicken Wrap

100 g

590kcal

Calories

195kcal
8.5g

Protein

13.5✓g
44g

Carbs

19.2g
6.5✓g

Fiber

2.1g
41g

Fat

6.2g
55✓

Glycemic Index

60
24

Glycemic Load

12✓
480✓mg

Potassium

210mg

Change food 1

Change food 2

Try another comparison

EatBetter

Scan calories with your camera

Instant AI nutrition analysis

App StoreGoogle Play
Fiskobirlik Sweet Hazelnut Paste vs Chicken Wrap — Calories & Nutrition Compared | EatBetter