Foods ▾
Ready & Packaged FoodsVegetables & LegumesDesserts & ConfectioneryMeat & ProteinGrains & BakeryBeveragesMilk & DairyNatural & Other Foods
Ready & Packaged Foods
All →Vegetables & Legumes
All →Desserts & Confectionery
All →Meat & Protein
All →Grains & Bakery
All →Beverages
All →Milk & Dairy
All →Tools ▾
Food GuideCompareBlogTR
Fisko Birlik no sugar hazelnut butter vs Almond
A side-by-side comparison on calories, macros, glycemic index and more.
The short answer
Per 100 g: Almond has fewer calories; Almond has more protein; Almond has more fiber; Almond has a lower glycemic index.
🥜
Fisko Birlik no sugar hazelnut butter
100 g
🥜
Almond
100 g
630kcal
Calories
579kcal
14.5g
Protein
21.2✓g
16g
Carbs
21.6g
9g
Fiber
12.5✓g
57g
Fat
49.9g
20
Glycemic Index
15✓
3
Glycemic Load
1✓
680mg
Potassium
733✓mg
Change food 1
Change food 2
Try another comparison
Fisko Birlik no sugar hazelnut butter vs Egg
Fisko Birlik no sugar hazelnut butter vs Butter
Fisko Birlik no sugar hazelnut butter vs Ground Beef
Fisko Birlik no sugar hazelnut butter vs Tomato
Fisko Birlik no sugar hazelnut butter vs Hawthorn Vinegar
Fisko Birlik no sugar hazelnut butter vs Mixed Green Salad
Scan calories with your camera
Instant AI nutrition analysis
